I'm saying nuffin (again) ... http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/article.aspx?cp-documentid=16400564 ...except it occurred to me that I've never put up any Rolling Stones stuff - until now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
ROLL OF HONOUR
- Android
- Another Nickel in The Machine
- b3ta.com
- babybarista
- badger
- barmaid
- Barnsley Bill
- Beau Bo D'Or
- blurred clarity
- Bug-Eyed Earl
- catch her in the wry
- Charon QC
- Cheezy
- Coffeespoons
- Crime Fiction
- Crunchy Frog
- curious black cat
- Daily Postcard
- Daisy's Dead Air
- Dead in Balham
- deadlistening
- Dental Maven
- Downtown Guy
- Dr Heckle
- elizabeth
- Findon
- GeekLawyer
- glorygloryleedsunited
- Hank's dreams
- Holly
- insitelaw crime stuff
- Jailhouse Lawyer
- Jessica Harper
- JoJo
- Julie/Juliet
- KAZ
- Kylie
- laci the dog
- law actually
- Law Minx
- Legal Rabbit
- lotus 07
- memphis steve
- Mike
- MiMi
- mountainous ambitions
- Mr Bastard
- Mrs Holly Hall
- ookami snow
- Pearl
- petit fleur
- plenty more fish out of water
- Random Pottins
- renegade eye
- Sarah Clover
- sarcastic bastard
- savannah
- Scarlet Blue
- Shorpy
- simply wondered
- St Jude
- Sybil Law
- the anti-stupid front
- The Corridor
- the daily g
- Tony
- Tory Troll
- unique stephen
- Yellow Dog Granny
Rabbit Links
About Me
- white rabbit
- The law I do is concerned with blood splatter patterns, bodily fluids and firearms residues as opposed to the more esoteric (and lucrative) commercial stuff. I am also a published novelist ('twentytwelve' published by Adonis and Abbey in 2006) which you should all order immediately in support of my desperate attempt to get its amazon.co.uk rating below half a million!
5 comments:
I love the way these things are worded, "Magistrates in Sunderland slapped her".
Can't seem to find any reference to that in the Sentencing Guidelines:-)
The Stones, let's stick with 'em.
why the hell was she refused bail? can only think she was going to shag loudly while on bail or to protect her from irate neighbours. whichever it is, i hardly think putting her in custody is the best use of the space and the money.
What infuriates me more in the first instance is that this couple were impounded for enjoying a basic human practise... If this was something which had happened in the USA it would never have come to court. WHAT DOES INFURIATE ME is that every power that be in the UK seem intent on clamping down on every little last "right" that we have as an individual in this godforsaken land. Will somebody eventually complain about my weekly "mattress burning" ceremony which I, as an ex - citizen of Dagenham hold to be one of my "human rights?"
I am not being facetious but when one is forced to live in a condition such as being jarred into a row of rabbit cages (no pun intended) it is inevitable that some noises may transmit into the next living accomodation. Such is life and one must live with the minor "inconvenience". I for one would attempt to share in their enjoyment whilst fumbling with my own private parts. Pity those who have not the perverse sexuality to enjoy such. Katy, my big-titted young piece of on-the-side stuff would perhaps complain otherwise as she has no comprehension of other people's misfortunes.
Nice to see you back on the web, by the way!
NICE!
Post a Comment